Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 34,134 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Saturday, September 8, 2012
5 Weird Medical Tests You Can Try Right Now and fail at
I failed Romberg's Test at the hospital although I can pass it now.
I can't tell if I failed Finger Measurement Test because I can't get my left hand into that position. Right hand looks ok.
I failed the Nose Test at the hospital with my left hand and still fail it(I must be constantly intoxicated, damn that red wine and dark beer)
I failed the Heel Test at the hospital with my left leg and still fail it today because my leg spasticity doesn't allow me to bend my knee.
I failed The "Prayer Position" Test and the Pinky Tests because I can't even flatten my left hand at all.
http://health.yahoo.net/articles/healthcare/photos/5-weird-medical-tests-you-can-try-right-now#0
I can't tell if I failed Finger Measurement Test because I can't get my left hand into that position. Right hand looks ok.
I failed the Nose Test at the hospital with my left hand and still fail it(I must be constantly intoxicated, damn that red wine and dark beer)
I failed the Heel Test at the hospital with my left leg and still fail it today because my leg spasticity doesn't allow me to bend my knee.
I failed The "Prayer Position" Test and the Pinky Tests because I can't even flatten my left hand at all.
http://health.yahoo.net/articles/healthcare/photos/5-weird-medical-tests-you-can-try-right-now#0
Study looks at rhythms of the brain
May be useful for our visual deficits so ask your researcher what it means for your rehab.
http://therapytoronto.ca/news/?p=5938
http://therapytoronto.ca/news/?p=5938
Combination of blood thinning drugs shown to be ineffective as stroke preventer
You have to read the complete article because they refer to lacunar strokes. This is for your doctor to consider so if they don't ask about it tell them.
http://www.healthcanal.com/brain-nerves/32026-Combination-blood-thinning-drugs-shown-ineffective-stroke-preventer.html
An international team led by a neurologist at the University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health has shown that a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel, both common blood thinners, does not prevent recurrence of a common type of stroke, and may even pose serious risks.
Combining aspirin and clopidogrel (known commercially as Plavix) was thought to hold promise in preventing recurring lacunar strokes – the death of brain cells caused by a narrowing of small blood vessels – by reducing the formation of clots in arteries supplying the brain.
Dr. Oscar Benavente, a UBC professor of neurology and research director of the Stroke and Cerebrovascular Health Program at Vancouver Coastal Health, sought to determine if a combination of clopidogrel and aspirin –another anti-clotting agent that is used to prevent strokes — would lower the recurrence of lacunar strokes more than aspirin alone. The study involved 3,020 patients from 82 sites in North America, Latin America, and Spain who were followed for several years.
White matter dementia
So make sure your doctors test for this before assuming your cognition problems are a result of the stroke. Then ask for a protocol to correct those problems.
http://tan.sagepub.com/content/5/5/267.abstract?etoc=
http://tan.sagepub.com/content/5/5/267.abstract?etoc=
Abstract
White matter dementia (WMD) is a syndrome
introduced in 1988 to highlight the potential of cerebral white matter disorders to produce cognitive loss of sufficient severity to qualify as dementia. Neurologists have long understood that such a syndrome can occur, but the dominance of gray matter as the
locus of higher function has strongly directed neurobehavioral inquiry to the cerebral cortex while white matter has
received less attention. Contemporary neuroimaging has been crucial in enabling the recognition of white matter abnormalities in a host of disorders, and the correlation of these changes with cognitive performance. Comprising about half the brain, white
matter is prominently or exclusively involved in well over 100 disorders,in each of which white matter dysfunction can
potentially cause or contribute to dementia. Neuropsychological findings from ten categories of white matter disorder lead to a
convergence of findings that document remarkable neurobehavioral commonality among the dementias produced. More recently, the
syndrome of mild cognitive dysfunction (MCD) has been introduced to expand the concept of WMD by proposing a precursor
syndrome related to early white matter neuropathology. WMD and MCD inform the understanding of how white matter contributes to
normal and abnormal cognition, and the specific neuroanatomic focus of these syndromes may enhance the diagnosis and treatment
of many disabling disorders that do not primarily implicate the cerebral cortex. Forming essential connections within widely
distributed neural networks, white matter is critical for rapid and efficient information transfer that complements the
information processing of gray matter. As neuroimaging continues to advance, further information on white matter structure can be
expected, and behavioral neurology will play a central role in elucidating the functional significance of these emerging data. By
emphasizing the contribution of myelinated systems to higher function, the study of white matter and cognition represents
investigation of the basic neuroscience of human behavior.
Cardiac Benefits of Red Wine Not From the Alcohol
Good luck finding dealcoholized red wine, unless you can substitute grape juice.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Hypertension/34610
Rest at the link, I suppose that they will next test the dark beers and say that the alcohol in them is not needed either. Taking all the fun out of life.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Hypertension/34610
Action Points
- Explain that a small Spanish open-label, crossover study found that consumption of a moderate amount of dealcoholized red wine over a 4-week period, but not red wine itself or gin, was associated with a modest decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
- Note that plasma nitric oxide was also increased when dealcoholized red wine was consumed, leading the authors to speculate that the blood pressure lowering effect might be due to nitric oxide.
Degenerative Diseases Of The Brain – New Therapies
Nothing directly for us here but our researchers should be able to posit some hypotheses about this helping our brain problems.
Degenerative Diseases Of The Brain – New Therapies
Late onset diseases like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s
disease (PD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are degenerative as
well as progressive and thereby diminish the quality of life of
patients significantly. At present, therapies to treat or reverse
degeneration of brain cells are limited and these diseases usually
progress into disabilities. However, recent research seems to indicate
that it may be possible to limit the damage caused by the onset of AD,
PD and ALS by activating innate biological mechanisms.A consequence of the natural respiration process that is always active in our cells is the production of harmful forms of oxygen, which are known as reactive oxygen species (ROS). Reactive oxygen species like hydroxyl ions and hydrogen peroxide are produced in mitochondria. During periods of wakefulness, our brain consumes 20% of the total oxygen used in the body and it therefore follows that the chances of generating reactive oxygen species in brain cells are very high. These highly destructive molecules are neutralized by two enzyme: heme oxidase-1 (HO-1) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). In the early stages of AD and PD, the activity of these enzymes is either normal or reduced. It is surmised that the capability of the brain to increase the activity of these antioxidants is diminished in the stages preceding the onset of these degenerative diseases. In the case of AD, the protein (beta-amyloid peptide) deposited on nerve cells actually causes an increase in the ROS within nerve cells.
Recent research suggests that inhalation of gases like hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide and carbon monoxide, in low and regulated doses, can actually help to reduce oxidative damage caused by ROS. Although hydrogen sulfide is toxic, small quantities of this gas can actually be therapeutic against ROS. A modified form of aspirin which can release hydrogen sulfide, termed as S-aspirin, is able to protect brain cells from damage caused by the beta-amyloid peptide. Similarly, hydrogen, when inhaled, can reach the brain within an hour and can help to reverse nerve cell damage evident in PD. Hydrogen can be also given to patients in the form of hydrogen water and is faster in action than when inhaled in gas form. In experimental animal models for Parkinson’s disease, treatment with hydrogen water helped to rescue neurons which respond to dopamine from damage caused by ROS.
Hydrogen is capable of reacting with hydroxyl radicals to form water. In addition to this short-term chemical neutralization of reactive oxygen species, exposure to low doses of hydrogen also causes enhanced expression of HO-1 and SOD enzymes. Similar effects are also seen when nerve cells are exposed to carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide. These medical gases boost innate protective responses against reactive oxygen species and provide long-term protection that goes beyond immediate and local chemistry in the brain. Exposure of brain cells to hydrogen sulfide also reduces the amount of beta-amyloid peptide in nerve cells thereby limiting the damage caused by this protein.
Since administration of medical gases is a pretty standard procedure in hospitals and clinics, these scientific advances may represent a chance of recovery to patients who have been diagnosed with debilitating diseases like AD, Parkinson’s disease and ALS, at least in the early stages. The efficiency of these treatments in patients suffering from advanced stages of these neurodegenerative diseases is not known yet.
AHA Scientific Sessions Offers Outstanding Late-Breaking Science
| From a AHA email I received. You will notice there is not one session on stroke rehabilitation or prevention of neuronal cascade of death. Scientific Sessions will again offer the latest science via its popular Late-Breaking Clinical Trials. Attendees will have the opportunity to hear 28 LBCTs. These presentations are selected based on their unique approach to the topic, their design methods and the overall quality of the statistical plan. In addition, 19 trials will be presented in the format of Clinical Science: Special Report sessions and will focus on registries, updates to existing trials and important clinical science. |
| The following presentations are scheduled, as of Aug. 13, 2012. LBCTs Practice Implications for CAD and VTE
A Population Perspective
|
| Clinical Science: Special Report sessions Prevention and Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease: Novel Approaches
The AHA will live stream 2012's LBCT Sessions I through VI. View these ground-breaking presentations from the convenience of your personal computer--as if you were with us in Los Angeles. Sessions will be available for purchase beginning Oct. 24.
|
Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review
This is probably more for your therapists and their management, so hand it to them and ask when it will be implemented. If we as survivors don't push new ideas it will take 30 years to get to clinical practice. So yes, I am blaming survivors for not pushing back on their medical staff for a lack of evidence-based practice for stroke rehab.
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/9/1/65/abstract
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/9/1/65/abstract
Abstract (provisional)
Background
Stroke is the most common cause of disability in the developed world and can severely
degrade walking function. Robot-driven gait therapy can provide assistance to patients
during training and offers a number of advantages over other forms of therapy. These
potential benefits do not, however, seem to have been fully realised as of yet in
clinical practice.
Objectives
This review determines ways in which robot-driven gait technology could be improved
in order to achieve better outcomes in gait rehabilitation.
Methods
The literature on gait impairments caused by stroke is reviewed, followed by research
detailing the different pathways to recovery. The outcomes of clinical trials investigating
robot-driven gait therapy are then examined. Finally, an analysis of the literature
focused on the technical features of the robot-based devices is presented. This review
thus combines both clinical and technical aspects in order to determine the routes
by which robot-driven gait therapy could be further developed.
Conclusions
Active subject participation in robot-driven gait therapy is vital to many of the
potential recovery pathways and is therefore an important feature of gait training.
Higher levels of subject participation and challenge could be promoted through designs
with a high emphasis on robotic transparency and sufficient degrees of freedom to
allow other aspects of gait such as balance to be incorporated.
The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production.
Longitudinal Analysis of Balance Confidence in Individuals With Stroke Using a Multilevel Model for Change
I do remember my OT telling me I needed confidence in my bad legs ability to hold myself up. And I bet I would have had a lot more confidence if fall-based therapy had been available.
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/26/8/999.abstract?etoc
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/26/8/999.abstract?etoc
Abstract
Background. Confidence about balance may be an important factor affecting self-efficacy for daily activities after stroke. Objective. The authors investigated whether confidence changes and the parameters that may predict changes in self-perceived balance
within the first year of community reintegration. Methods.
In this prospective study, 98 hemiparetic participants who could walk
at least 10 m independently were assessed 1, 3, 6,
and 12 months postdischarge from rehabilitation by
the Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go, 6-minute walking distance, and
depression and anxiety scales. The 98
age-/sex-matched controls were assessed at enrollment and the same
intervals. Multilevel
modeling was used to determine if assessed
covariates predicted changes in balance confidence by the
Activities-Specific Balance
Confidence Scale. Results. Stroke subjects
had lower initial balance confidence than controls and showed a
statistically significant increase in confidence
over 1 year at each assessment. Poor balance and
high state anxiety were associated with lower balance confidence.
Significant
interactions were observed between greater
depression, along with more impaired walking capacity and balance tests,
in predicting
lower change trajectories in confidence. Falls
predicted a reduced rate of improvement. Conclusions. Balance
confidence after stroke remained lower than controls over the first
year. Physical therapies and supportive interventions
designed to treat confidence should be initiated at
discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.
Theta Burst Stimulation in the Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb A Semirandomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Chronic Stroke Patients
A cooler name like theta probably makes getting grants for repeating similar research easier.
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/26/8/976.abstract?etoc
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/26/8/976.abstract?etoc
Abstract
Background. Noninvasive cortical stimulation could represent an add-on treatment to enhance motor recovery after stroke. However, its
clinical value, including anticipated size and duration of the treatment effects, remains largely unknown. Objective.
The authors designed a small semi-randomized clinical trial to explore
whether long-lasting clinically important gains can
be achieved by adding theta burst stimulation
(TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), to a
rehabilitation
program for the hand. Methods. A total of
41 chronic stroke patients received excitatory TBS to the ipsilesional
hemisphere or inhibitory TBS to the contralesional
hemisphere in 2 centers; each active group was
compared with a group receiving sham TBS. TBS was followed by physical
therapy
for 10 working days. Patients and therapists were
blinded to the type of TBS. Primary outcome measures (9-hole Peg Test
[9HPT],
Jebsen Taylor Test [JTT], and grip and pinch-grip
dynamometry) were assessed 4, 30, and 90 days post treatment. The
clinically
important difference was defined as 10% of the
maximum score. Results. There were no differences between the
active treatment and sham groups in any of the outcome measures. All
patients achieved
small sustainable improvements—9HPT, 5% of maximum
(confidence interval [CI] = 3%-7%); JTT, 5.7% (CI = 3%-8%); and grip
strength,
6% (CI = 2%-10%)—all below the defined clinically
important level. Conclusions. Cortical stimulation did not augment the gains from a late rehabilitation program. The effect size anticipated by the authors
was overestimated. These results can improve the design of future work on therapeutic uses of TMS.
Effects of Fast Functional Exercise on Muscle Activity After Stroke
If I could do anything fast I would.
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/26/8/968.abstract?etoc
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/26/8/968.abstract?etoc
Abstract
Background. In stroke rehabilitation,
considerable emphasis is placed on improving muscle strength with less
focus on the speed of movement.
Muscle power (product of force and velocity) is
essential for balance and mobility but velocity of movement is impaired
after
stroke. Objective. The purpose of this efficacy study is to determine if a single session of fast functional movements can increase muscle
activation and the speed of movement in participants with a subacute stroke. Methods.
In total, 32 individuals poststroke and 32 age- and sex-matched
controls performed a single session of 50 fast squats and
steps. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was
measured bilaterally in the rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF),
tibialis
anterior (TA), and soleus muscles. The average EMG
area and the movement speed were calculated over 10 trials. The effect
of exercise was determined as the change from the
second set (Start) to the last set (End) of 10 trials. Results.
The stroke group had significant increases in EMG area of the TA, BF,
and RF during the squatting exercise. There was an
increase in EMG area of the RF and BF when the
paretic leg was stepping. Improvements in EMG area of the soleus and RF
when
the paretic leg was in stance accompanied increases
in EMG area when the nonparetic leg was stepping. There was a trend for
improved movement speed for both exercises. Conclusion. A single session of exercises emphasizing speed of movement can be used to improve muscle activation in persons with mild
to moderately severe strokes.
Amount of Exercise in the First Week After Stroke Predicts Walking Speed and Unassisted Walking
I bet with some additional research they could correlate penumbra damage with predictions on walking speed and that would be objective and repeatable.
Amount of Exercise in the First Week After Stroke Predicts Walking Speed and Unassisted Walking
Abstract
Background.
Predicting walking outcomes poststroke is a challenge for clinicians.
Objective.
To identify the extent to which exercise dose (repetitions of leg movements) in the first week of a comprehensive stroke
unit stay predicts discharge mobility.
Methods.
A cohort study was conducted on 200 consecutive people admitted to a comprehensive stroke unit who required physical therapy.
Results.
Discharge and predictor data were
available for 191 survivors (99%). On admission, 86 participants were
able to walk, and
the average walking velocity was 0.42 m/s. On
discharge, the average walking velocity was 0.77 m/s, and 152
participants were
able to walk. A discharge walking velocity of
greater than 0.8 m/s was predicted by the exercise dose achieved in the
first
week after admission. Adding other predictors did
not significantly increase the predictive ability of the model.
Completion
of more than the median number of exercise
repetitions (703) in the first week of admission was associated with a
quicker
recovery of unassisted walking. This effect
persisted after adjustment for walking velocity on admission, cognition,
and comorbidity.
Conclusion.
Exercise dose in the first week after admission for stroke is an important indicator of walking speed at discharge and the
time to achieve unassisted walking.
Getting Neurorehabilitation Right What Can Be Learned From Animal Models?
And Dale Corbett is one of the authors.
Getting Neurorehabilitation Right What Can Be Learned From Animal Models?
Abstract
Animal models suggest that a month of
heightened plasticity occurs in the brain after stroke, accompanied by
most of the recovery
from impairment. This period of peri-infarct and
remote plasticity is associated with changes in excitatory/inhibitory
balance
and the spatial extent and activation of cortical
maps and structural remodeling. The best time for experience and
training
to improve outcome is unclear. In animal models,
very early (<5 and="and" conversely="conversely" damage.="damage." days="days" from="from" histological="histological" increased="increased" intense="intense" late="late" lead="lead" may="may" onset="onset" rehabilitation="rehabilitation" to="to" training="training">30 days) is much less effective both in terms of
outcome and morphological
changes associated with plasticity. In clinical
practice, rehabilitation after disabling stroke involves a relatively
brief
period of inpatient therapy that does not come
close to matching intensity levels investigated in animal models and
includes
the training of compensatory strategies that have
minimal impact on impairment. Current rehabilitation treatments have a
disappointingly
modest effect on impairment early or late after
stroke. Translation from animal models will require the following: (1)
substantial
increases in the intensity and dosage of treatments
offered in the first month after stroke with an emphasis on impairment;
(2) combinational approaches such as noninvasive
brain stimulation with robotics, based on current understanding of motor
learning and brain plasticity; and (3) research
that emphasizes mechanistic phase II studies over premature phase III
clinical
trials.
5>
Friday, September 7, 2012
Symptomatic therapy in multiple sclerosis: the role of cannabinoids in treating spasticity
I don't care if we accept workable clinical trials from Germany, if it works in MS lets test it in stroke survivors and get this done. Then we can get our states to allow medical marijuana. One step at a time but only if we as survivors demand it. Ask your doctor to sponsor such research and legislation. If I didn't have to fight spasticity all the time, recovering movement would be a breeze, contrary to Dr. William Landaus' opinion and research articles.
http://tan.sagepub.com/content/5/5/255.abstract?etoc=
http://tan.sagepub.com/content/5/5/255.abstract?etoc=
Abstract
A large proportion of patients with
multiple sclerosis (MS) have spasticity, which has a marked impact on
their quality of
life. Anecdotal evidence suggests a beneficial
effect of cannabis on spasticity as well as pain. Recently, randomized,
double-blind,
placebo-controlled studies have confirmed the
clinical efficacy of cannabinoids for the treatment of spasticity in
patients
with MS. Based on these data, nabiximols (Sativex),
a 1:1 mix of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol extracted from
cloned
Cannabis sativa chemovars, received
approval for treating MS-related spasticity in various countries around
the globe. In this article we
review the current understanding of cannabinoid
biology and the value of cannabinoids as a symptomatic treatment option
addressing
spasticity in patients with MS.
Thursday, September 6, 2012
How Does the Brain Recover After Stroke?
You have to read this bloggers description of what happens and then educate your doctor on it.
http://brainblogger.com/2012/09/05/how-does-the-brain-recover-after-stroke/
The last paragraph;
This study demonstrates that the brain is extremely capable at repairing itself, and suggests exciting new possibilities for improving recovery after traumatic brain injury and stroke in humans. Developing treatments that enhance this rewiring, sprouting and branching process may improve the likelihood of recovery for people who have lost cognitive or motor function due to injury.
http://brainblogger.com/2012/09/05/how-does-the-brain-recover-after-stroke/
The last paragraph;
This study demonstrates that the brain is extremely capable at repairing itself, and suggests exciting new possibilities for improving recovery after traumatic brain injury and stroke in humans. Developing treatments that enhance this rewiring, sprouting and branching process may improve the likelihood of recovery for people who have lost cognitive or motor function due to injury.
Vitamin D supplement fails to lower cholesterol in short term
So ask your doctor what you should do.
http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=123605&CultureCode=en
Taking vitamin D supplements to compensate for vitamin D deficiency didn’t improve cholesterol — at least in the short term, according to new research in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, an American Heart Association journal.
Researchers studied 151 people with vitamin D deficiency who received either a mega-dose (50,000 internationals units) of vitamin D3 or placebo weekly for eight weeks. Participants’ cholesterol levels were measured before and after treatment.
Correcting vitamin D deficiencies with high doses of oral vitamin D supplements did not change cholesterol levels, researchers found. This was despite effectively increasing vitamin D to recommended levels. Vitamin D levels nearly tripled in the group that received actual supplements, but were unchanged in the placebo group.
“Our study challenges the notion that vitamin D repletion improves cholesterol levels” said Manish Ponda, M.D., M.S., study lead author and assistant professor of clinical investigation in Dr. Jan Breslow’s laboratory of biochemical genetics and metabolism at The Rockefeller University in New York, N.Y. “These clinical trial results confirm those from a recent data mining study.”
The researchers also tested the effect of vitamin D supplementation on more sophisticated biomarker measures of cholesterol, such as particle size and number. “These measures of cholesterol, which are not used in routine clinical practice, also did not change in response to vitamin D therapy,” Ponda said.
As expected, replenishing subjects with high-dose supplements of oral vitamin D decreased parathyroid hormone levels and increased calcium levels — physical functional changes that were linked to participants’ increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL, bad cholesterol).
“For example, participants receiving vitamin D who had an increase in calcium levels experienced a 7 percent increase in LDL cholesterol, while those whose calcium levels fell or did not change had a 5 percent decrease in LDL cholesterol,” Ponda said.
The study questions the use of vitamin D supplements to improve cholesterol, Ponda said. While the dose of vitamin D in this study was high, it was appropriate for correcting a vitamin D deficiency over an eight week period.
However, longer-term studies on the impact of the changes in LDL cholesterol as a result of high dose vitamin D supplementation are needed to make stronger recommendations. And questions remain about whether increasing vitamin D levels with exposure to sunlight, the predominant natural source, would have a different effect than with high-dose oral supplements.
To address these issues, Ponda and Breslow will begin another clinical trial this fall, comparing the effect of oral vitamin D to ultraviolet light exposure with a longer follow-up period.
I am however taking this because it might help fatigue.
Or maybe to prevent muscle atrophy.
Or fall prevention.
http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=123605&CultureCode=en
Taking vitamin D supplements to compensate for vitamin D deficiency didn’t improve cholesterol — at least in the short term, according to new research in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, an American Heart Association journal.
Researchers studied 151 people with vitamin D deficiency who received either a mega-dose (50,000 internationals units) of vitamin D3 or placebo weekly for eight weeks. Participants’ cholesterol levels were measured before and after treatment.
Correcting vitamin D deficiencies with high doses of oral vitamin D supplements did not change cholesterol levels, researchers found. This was despite effectively increasing vitamin D to recommended levels. Vitamin D levels nearly tripled in the group that received actual supplements, but were unchanged in the placebo group.
“Our study challenges the notion that vitamin D repletion improves cholesterol levels” said Manish Ponda, M.D., M.S., study lead author and assistant professor of clinical investigation in Dr. Jan Breslow’s laboratory of biochemical genetics and metabolism at The Rockefeller University in New York, N.Y. “These clinical trial results confirm those from a recent data mining study.”
The researchers also tested the effect of vitamin D supplementation on more sophisticated biomarker measures of cholesterol, such as particle size and number. “These measures of cholesterol, which are not used in routine clinical practice, also did not change in response to vitamin D therapy,” Ponda said.
As expected, replenishing subjects with high-dose supplements of oral vitamin D decreased parathyroid hormone levels and increased calcium levels — physical functional changes that were linked to participants’ increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL, bad cholesterol).
“For example, participants receiving vitamin D who had an increase in calcium levels experienced a 7 percent increase in LDL cholesterol, while those whose calcium levels fell or did not change had a 5 percent decrease in LDL cholesterol,” Ponda said.
The study questions the use of vitamin D supplements to improve cholesterol, Ponda said. While the dose of vitamin D in this study was high, it was appropriate for correcting a vitamin D deficiency over an eight week period.
However, longer-term studies on the impact of the changes in LDL cholesterol as a result of high dose vitamin D supplementation are needed to make stronger recommendations. And questions remain about whether increasing vitamin D levels with exposure to sunlight, the predominant natural source, would have a different effect than with high-dose oral supplements.
To address these issues, Ponda and Breslow will begin another clinical trial this fall, comparing the effect of oral vitamin D to ultraviolet light exposure with a longer follow-up period.
I am however taking this because it might help fatigue.
Or maybe to prevent muscle atrophy.
Or fall prevention.
Statins are killers and cause major artery damage, say researchers
Inflammatory article from WDDTY - What Doctors don't tell you.
http://www.wddty.com/statins-are-killers-and-cause-major-artery-damage-say-researchers.html
The abstract this is based on is here; unless the complete study says something different, I don't see it.
http://www.wddty.com/statins-are-killers-and-cause-major-artery-damage-say-researchers.html
The abstract this is based on is here; unless the complete study says something different, I don't see it.
Progression of Vascular Calcification Is Increased With Statin Use in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT).
Ask your doctor to clarify.
Exercises to Target Specific Hamstring Muscles
There is no way I can even summarize this so ask your therapist to put it into understandable words if your hamstring needs help.
http://sportsmedresearch.blogspot.com/2012/08/hamstring-exercise-rankings.html
http://sportsmedresearch.blogspot.com/2012/08/hamstring-exercise-rankings.html
Blood Sugar Levels Linked to Brain Loss
We've already had enough brain loss so make sure your doctor doesn't allow any more of your brain to be lost.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Neurology/GeneralNeurology/34588
Higher blood glucose levels were associated with brain atrophy among healthy individuals in their early 60s, even when levels remained within the official normal range, an Australian study demonstrated.
After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, alcohol use, smoking, and APOE genotype, the associations between glucose and left and right hippocampal volumes were −131 and −148 (P=0.001 for both), with a positive association reflecting less atrophy, according to Nicolas Cherbuin, PhD, of Australian National University in Canberra, and colleagues.
The rest at the link.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Neurology/GeneralNeurology/34588
Higher blood glucose levels were associated with brain atrophy among healthy individuals in their early 60s, even when levels remained within the official normal range, an Australian study demonstrated.
After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, alcohol use, smoking, and APOE genotype, the associations between glucose and left and right hippocampal volumes were −131 and −148 (P=0.001 for both), with a positive association reflecting less atrophy, according to Nicolas Cherbuin, PhD, of Australian National University in Canberra, and colleagues.
The rest at the link.
Moving Physical Therapy Forward
You can listen to Joseph Brence, DPT talk about the need for PTs to have evidence to support their therapy. This was talked about here in 1994 by Carr and Shepherd. Why should he have to repeat this 18 years later?
http://pttalker.com/2012/09/moving-physical-therapy-forward/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PtTalker+%28PT+Talker%29
But then we might not get any therapy at all, for those like me who have large areas of dead brain, What will therapists provide as evidence? I remember my OT telling me that studies showed that survivors that didn't have this type of finger movement wouldn't recover finger movement. I still do not have finger movement but she kept trying and I will eventually prove it can be done.
http://pttalker.com/2012/09/moving-physical-therapy-forward/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PtTalker+%28PT+Talker%29
But then we might not get any therapy at all, for those like me who have large areas of dead brain, What will therapists provide as evidence? I remember my OT telling me that studies showed that survivors that didn't have this type of finger movement wouldn't recover finger movement. I still do not have finger movement but she kept trying and I will eventually prove it can be done.
Researchers Compare Walking Ability of Post-Stroke Patients and Non-Disabled Adults
Something we should have had for years, evidence-based practice.
http://www.ptproductsonline.com/news/2012-09-06_01.asp
Individuals with stroke have reduced walking activity, although it is unknown whether this deficit is due to a reduction in all aspects of walking activity or only in specific areas. Researchers from Delaware and Maine performed a study to examine the walking activity in post-stroke individuals compared with older adults without disability. The results were published in the September 2012 issue of Physical Therapy.
Margaret A. Roos, PT, DPT, PhD, NCS, from the department of physical therapy at the University of Delaware, Newark, Del, led the cross-sectional study of 54 post-stroke participants and 18 older adults reported as having no disability. All participants wore a step activity monitor for 3 days, which calculated steps per day (SPD), bouts per day (BPD), steps per bout (SPB), total time walking per day (TTW), percentage of time walking per day (PTW), and frequency of short, medium, and long walking bouts.
The researchers classified 29 participants as household and limited community ambulators (HHA-LCA group) and 22 participants as unlimited community ambulators (UCA group). According to the results, the SPD, TTW, PTW, and BPD measurements were the greatest in the older, non-disabled adults and the lowest in the HHA-LCA group. In addition, walking in the short, medium, and long categories was found to be lowest in the HHA-LCA group, greater in the UCA group, and greatest in the non-disabled group.
The specific descriptors of walking activity presented can provide insight into walking deficits post-stroke that cannot be determined by looking at steps per day alone. The researchers stress the need to analyze the structure of walking activity, concluding that the deficits found during this study could be addressed through appropriate exercise prescription.
http://www.ptproductsonline.com/news/2012-09-06_01.asp
Individuals with stroke have reduced walking activity, although it is unknown whether this deficit is due to a reduction in all aspects of walking activity or only in specific areas. Researchers from Delaware and Maine performed a study to examine the walking activity in post-stroke individuals compared with older adults without disability. The results were published in the September 2012 issue of Physical Therapy.
Margaret A. Roos, PT, DPT, PhD, NCS, from the department of physical therapy at the University of Delaware, Newark, Del, led the cross-sectional study of 54 post-stroke participants and 18 older adults reported as having no disability. All participants wore a step activity monitor for 3 days, which calculated steps per day (SPD), bouts per day (BPD), steps per bout (SPB), total time walking per day (TTW), percentage of time walking per day (PTW), and frequency of short, medium, and long walking bouts.
The researchers classified 29 participants as household and limited community ambulators (HHA-LCA group) and 22 participants as unlimited community ambulators (UCA group). According to the results, the SPD, TTW, PTW, and BPD measurements were the greatest in the older, non-disabled adults and the lowest in the HHA-LCA group. In addition, walking in the short, medium, and long categories was found to be lowest in the HHA-LCA group, greater in the UCA group, and greatest in the non-disabled group.
The specific descriptors of walking activity presented can provide insight into walking deficits post-stroke that cannot be determined by looking at steps per day alone. The researchers stress the need to analyze the structure of walking activity, concluding that the deficits found during this study could be addressed through appropriate exercise prescription.
What is your stroke protocol?
Definition: The plan for a course of medical treatment or for a scientific experiment.
Isn't this by definition what Physiatrists or PM&R doctors supposed to do? Or is yours like mine was; hand you off to the therapists with ET, evaluate and treat, nothing scientific there and no way to monitor progress against your goals. You did discuss your goals with your doctor, didn't you? 100% recovery. I had no goal discussion with my doctor.
Wouldn't you think that stroke rehab would have the same type of detail as below?

Check out what colon cancer has from Medscape
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2005487-overview
The value of adjuvant therapy in stage II disease is at best controversial; however, the following regimens may be used:
Adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients with stage II is an option, and common regimens include use of 5-FU and leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin or capecitabine.[1]
The following regimens are acceptable adjuvant therapies for stage III disease for resectable colon cancer:
Chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease includes the use of multiple drugs as single agents or as combination regimens.[4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
First-line chemotherapy for bevacizumab candidates:
Third-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease:
Isn't this by definition what Physiatrists or PM&R doctors supposed to do? Or is yours like mine was; hand you off to the therapists with ET, evaluate and treat, nothing scientific there and no way to monitor progress against your goals. You did discuss your goals with your doctor, didn't you? 100% recovery. I had no goal discussion with my doctor.
Wouldn't you think that stroke rehab would have the same type of detail as below?
Check out what colon cancer has from Medscape
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2005487-overview
Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable colon cancer
Stage 0 and I:- Patients do not require adjuvant therapy
Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colon cancer
Stage IIA, B and C (node-negative)[1, 2, 3] :The value of adjuvant therapy in stage II disease is at best controversial; however, the following regimens may be used:
- Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 PO BID on days 1-14; repeat cycle every 21d for 8 cycles or
- Leucovorin 500 mg/m2 given as a 2-h infusion and repeated weekly for 6wk plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 given as a bolus 1h after the start of leucovorin and repeated 6 times weekly; every 8wk for 4 cycles or
- Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2d (total 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48h) continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk
Adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients with stage II is an option, and common regimens include use of 5-FU and leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin or capecitabine.[1]
- mFOLFOX6: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2d continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk or
- FLOX: 5-FU 500 mg/m2 IV weekly plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 IV weekly for 6wk (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36) of each 8-wk cycle plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV administered on days 1, 15, and 29 of each 8-wk cycle for 3 cycles or
- Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 PO BID on days 1-14; repeat cycle every 21d for 8 cycles
Adjuvant therapy for resectable cancer
Stage III (node-positive)[2, 3] :The following regimens are acceptable adjuvant therapies for stage III disease for resectable colon cancer:
- mFOLFOX6: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk or
- FLOX: 5-FU 500 mg/m2 IV weekly plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 IV weekly for 6wk (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36) of each 8-wk cycle plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV administered on days 1, 15, and 29 of each 8-wk cycle for 3 cycles or
- Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 PO BID on days 1-14; repeat cycle every 21d for 8 cycles or
- CapeOx: Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 over 2h on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 PO BID on days 1-14 every 3wk for 8 cycles or
- Leucovorin 500 mg/m2 given as a 2-h infusion and repeated weekly for 6wk plus 5-FU 500 mg/m2 given as a bolus 1h after the start of leucovorin and repeated 6 times weekly; every 8wk for 4 cycles or
- Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2d (total 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48h) continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk
Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable metastatic disease
Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable metastatic disease is usually administered for approximately 2-3mo, limiting the development of hepatotoxicity.[3] Regimens for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy are similar.- mFOLFOX6: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk or
- FOLFIRI: Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 IV over 30-90min on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV infusion to match duration of irinotecan infusion on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d (total 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48h) continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk
- CapeOx with or without bevacizumab: Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 over 2h on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 PO BID for 14d; repeat every 3wk plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg IV every 3wk
Chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease
Stage IV:Chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease includes the use of multiple drugs as single agents or as combination regimens.[4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
First-line chemotherapy for bevacizumab candidates:
- mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab: Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg over 30-90min on day 1 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4-6 cycles with reevaluation for maintenance therapy (1 g of calcium gluconate and 1 g of magnesium sulfate may be give over 15min preinfusion and postinfusion to reduce the risk of neurotoxicity) or
- FLOX plus bevacizumab: Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg over 30-90min on days 1, 15, and 29 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, and 29 plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 plus 5-FU 500 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 39 for 2 cycles followed by reevaluation or
- FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab: Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg over 30-90min on day 1 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m2 IV over 30-90 min on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV infusion to match duration of irinotecan infusion on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2d (total 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48h) continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4-6 cycles with reevaluation for maintenance therapy or
- CAPEOX plus bevacizumab: Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg over 30-90min on day 1 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 over 2h on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 PO BID for 14d; repeat every 21d for 4 cycles followed by reevaluation for maintenance therapy or
- Capecitabine plus bevacizumab (in patients not able to undergo treatment with oxaliplatin or irinotecan): Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 plus capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 PO BID for 14d; repeat cycle every 21d for 8 cycles, then reevaluate for maintenance or
- DeGramont regimen plus bevacizumab (in patients not able to undergo treatment with oxaliplatin or irinotecan): Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg over 30-90min on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d (total 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48h) continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4-6 cycles with reevaluation for maintenance therapy or
- Bevacizumab plus 5-FU and leucovorin (Roswell Park) (in patients unable to undergo treatment with oxaliplatin or irinotecan): Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg over 30-90min on day 1 plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 over 2h plus 5-FU 500 mg/m2 bolus every 2wk for 4-6 cycles with reevaluation for maintenance therapy
- mFOLFOX6: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4 cycles or
- FLOX: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, and 29 plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 39 for 2 cycles followed by reevaluation or
- FOLFIRI: Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 IV over 30-90min on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV infusion to match duration of irinotecan infusion on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d (total 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48h) continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4 cycles or
- Capecitabine: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 PO BID on days 1-14; repeat cycle every 21d until progression or
- Roswell Park regimen: Leucovorin 500 mg/m2 IV weekly for 6wk over 2h followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m2 IV bolus weekly for 6wk; repeat cycle every 8wk or
- CapeOx: Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 over 2h on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 BID for 14d every 21d for 4 cycles followed by reevaluation for maintenance therapy or
- mFOLFOX6 plus cetuximab (only for KRAS wild-type tumors): Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose on day 1, then cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4 cycles, then reevaluate or
- FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (only for KRAS wild-type tumors): Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose over 2h on day 1, then cetuximab 250 mg/m2 over 1h weekly plus irinotecan 180 mg/m2 IV over 30-90min on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV infusion to match duration of irinotecan infusion on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d (total 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48h) continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4 cycles, then reevaluate or
- Referral for clinical trial
- FOLFIRI (if FOLFOX, CapeOx, CapeOx plus bevacizumab or FOLFOX plus bevacizumab used as first-line chemotherapy): Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 IV over 30-90min on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV infusion to match duration of irinotecan infusion on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d (total 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48h) continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4 cycles, then reevaluate or
- FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (only for KRAS wild-type tumors and if FOLFOX, CapeOx, CapeOx plus bevacizumab or FOLFOX plus bevacizumab used as first–line chemotherapy): Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose over 2h on day 1, then cetuximab 250 mg/m2 over 1h weekly plus irinotecan 180 mg/m2 IV over 30-90min on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV infusion to match duration of irinotecan infusion on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d (total 2400 mg/m2 over 46-48h) continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4 cycles and then reevaluate or
- mFOLFOX6 (if FOLFIRI or FOLFIFI plus bevacizumab used as first-line chemotherapy): Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2-d continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4 cycles or
- CapeOx: Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 over 2h on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 BID for 14d every 21d for 4 cycles followed by reevaluation for maintenance therapy or
- mFOLFOX6 plus cetuximab (only for KRAS wild-type tumors and if FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab used as first-line chemotherapy): Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose on day 1 over 2h, then cetuximab 250 mg/m2 over 1h weekly plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2h day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/day for 2d continuous infusion; repeat every 2wk for 4 cycles and then reevaluate or
- Irinotecan 125 mg/m2 over 90min weekly with reevaluation after 8wk or
- Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 over 2h on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 over 1h weekly with reevaluation after 8wk or
- Panitumumab 6 mg/kg over 60-90min every 2wk with reevaluation after 8wk or
- Modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab (if FOLFIRI used upfront and bevacizumab never used as first-line chemotherapy; note higher dose of bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy): Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg over 30-90min on day 1 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 over 2h on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 over 2h plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion over 46h every 2wk for 4-6 cycles with reevaluation for maintenance therapy (1 g of calcium gluconate and 1 g of magnesium sulfate may be give over 15min preinfusion and postinfusion to reduce the risk of neurotoxicity) or
- CAPEOX plus bevacizumab (if FOLFIRI used upfront and bevacizumab never used as first-line chemotherapy; note higher dose of bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy): Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg over 30-90min on day 1 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 over 2h on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 BID for 14d every 21d for 4 cycles followed by reevaluation for maintenance therapy or
- FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (if FOLFOX or CAPEOX used upfront and bevacizumab never used as first-line chemotherapy): Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg over 30-90min on day 1 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m2 over 90min on day 1 plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 over 2h on day 1 plus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1 followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion over 46h every 2wk for 4-6 cycles with reevaluation for maintenance therapy or
- Aflibercept 4 mg/kg IV infused over 1 hr q2weeks plus FOLFIRI in mCRC resistant to or has progressed after an oxaliplatin regimen; administer before any component of FOLFIRI regimen on the day of treatment
- Referral for clinical trial
Third-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease:
- Panitumumab 6 mg/kg over 60-90min every 2wk for KRAS wild-type tumors only with reevaluation after 8wk or
- Any regimen incorporating an EGFR antibody for patients with KRAS wild-type disease using a cytotoxic backbone not previously tried or
- Referral for clinical trial
Summary of guiding principles in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer
- Importance of differentiating between M1a (1 organ site of metastatic disease) and M1b (more than 1 organ site) in view of curative potential of 1 organ site
- Selection of oxaliplatin or irinotecan as part of cytotoxic backbone upfront in metastatic disease is based primarily on toxicity profile
- Bevacizumab improves survival as first-line and second-line therapy and works with irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-based therapy
- Addition of bevacizumab to irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL) significantly improved the response rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival
- The addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy results in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
- Interruption in therapy is not ideal for patients; some form of therapy should always be continued after a stable disease state is obtained
- Single-agent maintenance bevacizumab may be a feasible option for patients receiving bevacizumab + CapeOx as induction therapy
- There are no data on maintenance anti-EGFR therapy
- Anti-EGFR antibody therapy should be given only to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors
- Anti-EGFR antibody therapy and bevacizumab should never be combined
- Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in randomized clinical trials using both FOLFOX and FOLFIRI cytotoxic backbones has been improved only in those patients with KRAS wild-type tumors
- The data on BRAF status are still preliminary in terms of predictive value, but there is a suggestion that even in the setting of KRAS wild-type tumors, BRAF mutation abrogates the effect of anti-EGFR antibody therapy; it is, however, prognostic of a worse outcome
- Optimal use of all therapeutic agents improves survival in patients with metastatic disease
- It is reasonable to leave the primary therapy in place and start treatment for metastatic disease
- A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to deal with the complicated issue of potentially resectable or marginally resectable metastatic disease
- Pharmacogenomics profiling beyond KRAS mutation status is not yet standard of care
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Etiologic work-up crucial after stroke
Etiology is the study of causation, or origination. The word is derived from the Greek αἰτιολογία, aitiologia, "giving a reason for". And after the workup they should put that into a stroke causation database so everyone can read about it.
http://www.news-medical.net/news/20120905/Etiologic-work-up-crucial-after-stroke.aspx
http://www.news-medical.net/news/20120905/Etiologic-work-up-crucial-after-stroke.aspx
Connexin 36 Promotes Cortical Spreading Depolarization and Ischemic Brain Damage
What is the logical conclusion after this research and what theory can be tested to help survivors?
Connexin 36 Promotes Cortical Spreading Depolarization and Ischemic Brain Damage
Abstract
Cortical
spreading depolarization (CSD) promotes the progression of neuronal
injury after cerebral ischemia. However, the mechanisms of propagation
of postischemic CSD events are still unclear. In this study we
characterized the role of the main neuronal gap junction protein
connexin 36 (Cx36) in generating postischemic CSDs.
In
Cx36-deficient mice and controls we occluded the distal middle cerebral
artery. To detect CSD events we recorded the direct current and laser
Doppler flow. In addition, locomotor function and the infarct size were
determined.
Cx36-deficient mice had significantly
fewer and shorter CSD events than wild-type controls. Additionally, Cx36
deletion is neuroprotective, leading to a better functional outcome and
decreased infarct size after ischemia.
These results suggest a detrimental role for Cx36 after ischemia, possibly by promoting CSD.
Tests for silent neck artery narrowing to curb stroke risk: Waste of resources
Well are there other options? like;
Do you want the lawnmower?
http://www.articlecity.com/videos/health/Lawnmower-For-Clogged-Arteries-175286465.php
Or Drano? I would be worried about this, sloughing off chunks
http://www.ivanhoe.com/channels/p_channelstory.cfm?storyid=26404
and the waste of resources here:
http://www.sciencecodex.com/tests_for_silent_neck_artery_narrowing_to_curb_stroke_risk_waste_of_resources-97904
This was the starting point of my stroke and could have been solved if when my Dad was diagnosed with 85% blockage his doctor had recommended that any children get tested, At the time of my stroke it was estimated at 85 % blockage(This was 3 years later) when an ultrasound was done and I found out that the right carotid was totally blocked. The blockage was never found during my hospital stay. I consider that a complete failure on my doctors part. I luckily did not have any further strokes during that 3 year window of high danger.
Do you want the lawnmower?
http://www.articlecity.com/videos/health/Lawnmower-For-Clogged-Arteries-175286465.php
Or Drano? I would be worried about this, sloughing off chunks
http://www.ivanhoe.com/channels/p_channelstory.cfm?storyid=26404
and the waste of resources here:
http://www.sciencecodex.com/tests_for_silent_neck_artery_narrowing_to_curb_stroke_risk_waste_of_resources-97904
This was the starting point of my stroke and could have been solved if when my Dad was diagnosed with 85% blockage his doctor had recommended that any children get tested, At the time of my stroke it was estimated at 85 % blockage(This was 3 years later) when an ultrasound was done and I found out that the right carotid was totally blocked. The blockage was never found during my hospital stay. I consider that a complete failure on my doctors part. I luckily did not have any further strokes during that 3 year window of high danger.
Who Best to Create a Sense of Urgency for Acute Stroke Treatment? Commentary on “Neurohospitalists Improve Door-to-Needle Times for Patients With Ischemic Stroke Receiving Intravenous tPA”
I'm sorry but the urgency they are trying to create to speed up tPA time is the wrong focus. A separate and just as important focus should be to find multiple ways to stop the neuronal cascade of death. And that will have to come from survivors. 17 years to find out that tPA is hard to implement is a colossal failure. Fire them and put survivors in charge if you want something done.
http://nho.sagepub.com/content/2/4/117.full?etoc
In the 17 years since the efficacy of intravenous tissue
plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischemic stroke was first
established,1 we have struggled to develop the infrastructures and systems of care that are necessary to deliver this therapy as quickly
and efficiently as possible.
Speed matters. Although delays in presenting
to the emergency department account for most of the unrealized potential
of thrombolysis,2
the time from when a patient arrives in the emergency department to
when the tPA infusion begins—the door-to-needle time—presents
a more readily accessible target for hospital-level
interventions. Pooled data from 6 randomized trials3 and analyses of large observational data sets4
consistently show that faster door-to-needle times are associated with
better patient outcomes. In fact, each 15-minute decrease
in door-to-needle time is associated with a 5% lower
odds of in-hospital mortality.4 Therefore, the American Heart Association: Target Stroke initiative has set a specific goal of raising the percentage of
patients treated within 60 minutes from the current level of 29% to over 50%.4
Precisely how to actually achieve this goal involves evaluating a variety of factors, but certainly one important consideration
is ensuring that appropriate staffing is available for these neurological emergencies. In this issue of The Neurohospitalist, Bhatt and Shatila examine the impact of neurohospitalists on door-to-needle times for acute ischemic stroke.5
The study includes data from 107 consecutive patients treated with
intravenous (IV) tPA at 2 community hospitals between
July 2009 and September 2011. The study was a natural
experiment of sorts: halfway though the study period, coverage for acute
stroke calls from the emergency department changed
from a rotating schedule of 4 community neurologists with shared
inpatient
and outpatient responsibilities to a neurohospitalist
model staffed by 2 inpatient-based neurologists. Occasional weekend
coverage continued to be provided by locums tenens and
community neurologists.
The primary finding was that among patients
treated with IV thrombolysis for stroke, 51% (24 of 47) of those
evaluated by
neurohospitalists were treated in 60 minutes or less,
compared with 15% (9 of 60) of those evaluated by nonneurohospitalists—a
difference that may be due, at least in part, to the
greater likelihood that a neurohospitalists is in hospital for an
emergency
in-person consultation.
Bhatt and Shatila are generally careful not
to assert a causal relationship between a neurohospitalist’s involvement
and faster
door-to-needle times, with the notable exception of
the article’s title. Such caution is warranted. First, there are likely
to be unmeasured confounders and secular trends at
play. For example, a t test comparing the mean performance of
the 2 groups may obscure a secular trend of improved door-to-needle
times over time.
Other analytic methods such as interrupted time series
analysis are often used to mitigate this possibility in other quality
improvement studies. Next, relevant details on how the
availability of neurohospitalists would actually impact the response
time are unavailable. These details would be
especially important to understand and evaluate because the acute stroke
response
involves interactions between multiple disciplines—not
just the neurohospitalist—and since shared knowledge and best practices
at the team- or hospital-level would be expected to
diffuse to the care of all patients over time. Finally, upward of 90%
of the observed difference was driven by the
performance of the neurohospitalist with specific certification in
vascular neurology—someone
with both the experience and interest to shepherd the
performance improvement seen here.
So can we attribute these improvements to
neurohospitalist staffing, to vascular neurology training, or perhaps to
the involvement
of a motivated, invested, and accountable champion for
change regardless of specialty? I would say that what probably matters
most is the watchful eye and the sustained involvement
of someone with an interest in improving these processes and outcomes—a
motivated neurohospitalist may be ideally situated to
take on this role.
Monday, September 3, 2012
New technique helps determine degree of muscle wasting in critically ill patients
While we as stroke patients may not be critically ill we do have muscle wastage that should be objectively measured and come up with ways to correct it. So ask your doctor what they are doing about this problem. I know I had this because my AFO got looser rather rapidly and my doctor never checked on it.
http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=123625&CultureCode=en
Researchers have identified a new technique that can help determine the severity of muscle loss in critically ill patients. The breakthrough could lead to new research to help prevent muscle-wasting and new therapeutic interventions to help treat critically ill patients.
The results of the study will be presented today (2 September 2012) at the European Respiratory Society’s Annual Congress in Vienna.
Patients who are critically ill with multi-organ failure often have significant muscle wasting after recovering from their illness. This can delay their discharge from an intensive care unit and is a major cause of disability affecting quality of life once patients have left the hospital.
Until now, there has been no clinically useful way of measuring muscle wastage, or identifying patients who are at a high-risk of this. The researchers hypothesised that they could measure the rectus femoris, one of the four quadriceps muscles in the leg, to determine the level of muscle wasting.
63 patients were recruited to the study within 24 hours of admission to hospital. Muscle wasting was assessed using an ultrasound to measure muscle circumference of the rectus femoris. Researchers also monitored the number of failed organ systems during the patient’s time in intensive care, to assess which patients were at a high risk of muscle wasting.
The researchers determined that circumference measurements of the rectus femoris area by ultra sound can objectively track muscle loss early in critical illness. They also determined that the greatest reduction in muscle circumference was seen in patients with multi-organ failure. In patients with multi-organ failure, the circumference of the rectus femoris was reduced by approximately 21.53%. This compared with an approximate reduction of 7.2% in people with single organ failure.
Lead author, Dr Zudin Puthucheary from University College London, UK, said: “Our research has determined that measuring the rectus femoris using ultrasound is a useful tool to analyse the degree of muscle wasting in critically ill patients. This is clinically relevant as it can help healthcare professionals detect those at high-risk of muscle loss and provide interventions to help improve their quality of life. It is also an important discovery for research as it can help scientists track muscle response to different interventions, so we can find new solutions to addressing this problem in our critically ill patients.”
http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=123625&CultureCode=en
Researchers have identified a new technique that can help determine the severity of muscle loss in critically ill patients. The breakthrough could lead to new research to help prevent muscle-wasting and new therapeutic interventions to help treat critically ill patients.
The results of the study will be presented today (2 September 2012) at the European Respiratory Society’s Annual Congress in Vienna.
Patients who are critically ill with multi-organ failure often have significant muscle wasting after recovering from their illness. This can delay their discharge from an intensive care unit and is a major cause of disability affecting quality of life once patients have left the hospital.
Until now, there has been no clinically useful way of measuring muscle wastage, or identifying patients who are at a high-risk of this. The researchers hypothesised that they could measure the rectus femoris, one of the four quadriceps muscles in the leg, to determine the level of muscle wasting.
63 patients were recruited to the study within 24 hours of admission to hospital. Muscle wasting was assessed using an ultrasound to measure muscle circumference of the rectus femoris. Researchers also monitored the number of failed organ systems during the patient’s time in intensive care, to assess which patients were at a high risk of muscle wasting.
The researchers determined that circumference measurements of the rectus femoris area by ultra sound can objectively track muscle loss early in critical illness. They also determined that the greatest reduction in muscle circumference was seen in patients with multi-organ failure. In patients with multi-organ failure, the circumference of the rectus femoris was reduced by approximately 21.53%. This compared with an approximate reduction of 7.2% in people with single organ failure.
Lead author, Dr Zudin Puthucheary from University College London, UK, said: “Our research has determined that measuring the rectus femoris using ultrasound is a useful tool to analyse the degree of muscle wasting in critically ill patients. This is clinically relevant as it can help healthcare professionals detect those at high-risk of muscle loss and provide interventions to help improve their quality of life. It is also an important discovery for research as it can help scientists track muscle response to different interventions, so we can find new solutions to addressing this problem in our critically ill patients.”
Fly through the brain of a mouse
Ok, not too useful for us but the eventual possibilities for understanding our brains are great.
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2012/09/matrix-like-fly-through-shows-brain-in-amazing-detail.html?
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2012/09/matrix-like-fly-through-shows-brain-in-amazing-detail.html?
Aqua-wheelchair performs flips underwater
Ask your therapist for this. I could easily see the fantastic therapeutic stroke rehab possibilities. I would have been able to reduce the spasticity preventing me from raising my left arm. That alone would make it cost feasible.
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2012/08/aqua-wheelchair-performs-flips-underwater.html?
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2012/08/aqua-wheelchair-performs-flips-underwater.html?
Statins linked with development of cataracts
Another discussion point with your doctor, if you are keeping track I'll be indexing all of statin side effects under that name for your ease of doctor questioning.
http://www.theheart.org/article/1434435.do?utm_medium=email&utm_source=20120903_TopTen&utm_campaign=newsletter
Statin users are more than 50% likelier to develop age-related cataracts, according to the results of a new study [1]. And type 2 diabetics who use statins are at even greater risk of cataracts, report investigators.
Waterloo Eye Study includes almost 6500 patients
http://www.theheart.org/article/1434435.do?utm_medium=email&utm_source=20120903_TopTen&utm_campaign=newsletter
Statin users are more than 50% likelier to develop age-related cataracts, according to the results of a new study [1]. And type 2 diabetics who use statins are at even greater risk of cataracts, report investigators.
"The bioplausibility of these results lies in
the fact that the crystalline lens membrane requires high cholesterol
for proper epithelial cell development and lens transparency," write Dr Carolyn Machan (University of Waterloo, ON) and colleagues in the August 2012 issue of Optometry and Vision Science.
"Increased cataract formation has been seen in both animals and humans
with hereditary cholesterol deficiency, and the risk exists that statins
can inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis in the human lens."
Asked to comment on the paper for heartwire, Dr Richard Karas
(Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA), called the findings
"an interesting observation [that] isn't alarmist." There is, he says, a
"suggestion" here that statins may increase the risk of cataracts, but
this visual problem eventually afflicts everyone of a certain age
anyhow, he says, adding that further study of this association will be
required.
Waterloo Eye Study includes almost 6500 patients
The analysis included 6397 patients with and
without diabetes. As the researchers note, diabetes is a risk factor for
the development of cataracts, leading the group to analyze the
prevalence of cataracts among patients with diabetes taking statins
(n=452) and the prevalence among those taking statins but without
diabetes (n=5884). The mean age of patients with diabetes was 14 years
older than those without diabetes and included a slightly higher
proportion of female subjects. The prevalence of statin use in patients
38 years of age and older was 56% for those with type 2 diabetes and 16%
for those without diabetes.
In the study, known as the Waterloo Eye Study,
diabetes was associated with an 86% higher risk of developing cataracts
(odds ratio [OR] 1.86; 95% CI 1.34-2.59) across the lifespan after
researchers controlled for multiple variables, including age, female
sex, smoking, and blood pressure. A diagnosis of diabetes was also
associated with an increased risk of different subtypes of cataracts: an
84% greater risk of nuclear sclerosis, a 38% higher risk of cortical
cataract, and a 52% rise in posterior subcapsular cataract
Statin use was also associated with a
significantly increased risk of developing age-related cataracts (OR
1.57; 95% CI 1.15-2.13) and some subtypes, including a 48% higher risk
of nuclear sclerosis and a 48% rise in posterior subcapsular cataract
but no increased risk of cortical cataract.
In an analysis of cataract prevalence among
patients with and without diabetes taking statins, Machan and colleagues
found that the prevalence of cataract increased at a faster rate in
patients with diabetes who used statins. "Similar prevalence levels were
seen in patients with diabetes who did not use statins and in patients
without diabetes who did use statins," according to the researchers.
"The prevalence of cataract increased at the slowest rate in patients
without diabetes who did not use statins."
Are you on your own for stroke recovery?
Did your doctor and therapists not have a plan B? Then your plan B will have to be Steven Wolfs contention, 'Stroke patients need to rely more on their own problem solving to regain mobility', I can't give you any medical advice but if you read all the entries in my blog, wink,wink, you might be able to figure what to do to continue your recovery. Your recovery can continue as long as you keep working at it. I'm going to be doing this till the day I die.
Sunday, September 2, 2012
Muscle action and explanation for stroke rehab
I'm sure your therapists throw a lot of muscle names at you. This site can explain what they are referring to and for those of the do-it-yourself plan you can use it for your mental imagery and action observation.
http://www.getbodysmart.com/
My first lookup was the latissimus dorsi to find out which muscle is causing me so much grief in trying to raise my arm due to spasticity. And as Steven Wolf says, 'Stroke patients need to rely more on their own problem solving to regain mobility', this would be a good start for your problem solving.
http://www.getbodysmart.com/
My first lookup was the latissimus dorsi to find out which muscle is causing me so much grief in trying to raise my arm due to spasticity. And as Steven Wolf says, 'Stroke patients need to rely more on their own problem solving to regain mobility', this would be a good start for your problem solving.
Saturday, September 1, 2012
Red Meat Consumption and Risk of Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.
And even our American Heart Association promotes the conflating of corellation and causation. They should be working on figuring out how to stop the neuronal cascade of death. How about it, Ms. Nancy Brown?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22851546
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22851546
Stroke. 2012 Jul 31. [Epub ahead of print]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
Prospective studies of red meat consumption and risk of stroke have provided inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence regarding the effects of red meat (fresh, processed, and total) consumption on stroke risk. (Where's the hard work stopping neuronal death?)METHODS:
Studies were identified by searching the PubMed database through May 26, 2012, and by reviewing the reference lists of retrieved articles. Prospective studies that reported relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between red meat consumption and risk of stroke were eligible.RESULTS:
Five articles including results from 6 prospective studies with 10ü630 cases of stroke and 329ü495 participants were included in the meta-analysis. For each serving per day increase in fresh red meat, processed meat, and total red meat consumption, the RR (95% CI) of total stroke were 1.11 (1.03-1.20), 1.13 (1.03-1.24), and 1.11 (1.06-1.16), respectively, without heterogeneity among studies (P>0.16). Among 4 articles with results for stroke subtypes, the risk of ischemic stroke was positively associated with consumption of fresh red meat (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00-1.27), processed meat (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.24), and total red meat (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.19); no statistically significant associations were observed for hemorrhagic stroke.CONCLUSIONS:
Results from this meta-analysis indicate that consumption of fresh red meat and processed red meat as well as total red meat is associated with increased risk of total stroke and ischemic stroke, but not hemorrhagic stroke.Eating small bar of chocolate cuts risks of stroke in men
I hate these articles, correlation does not prove causation. And it dumps all responsibility for preventing stroke damage on the patient. Rather than doing the hard research necessary to prevent the neuronal cascade of death. I expect better from our researchers and no one is calling out them on their taking the easy way out.
http://www.healthcareglobal.com/administration/eating-small-bar-of-chocolate-cuts-risks-of-stroke-in-men
http://www.healthcareglobal.com/administration/eating-small-bar-of-chocolate-cuts-risks-of-stroke-in-men
According to a new study, eating a small bar of chocolate every week
can considerably lessens the risk of stroke in men. The study conducted
on more than 37,000 Swedish men showed that those eating chocolates were
least likely to have a stroke.
Other studies have suggested that eating chocolate can definitely
improve the health of the heart. The participants of the study were
asked about their habits of eating and for a decade their health was
monitored.
Based on the amount of chocolate, they were split into four groups,
with the bottom group eating, on average, no chocolate each week.
Meanwhile, the top group had 63 grams, slightly more than an average
bar. Study also found that those eating the most chocolate were 17% less
likely to have a stroke.
Prof Susanna Larsson, said, “The beneficial effect of chocolate
consumption on stroke may be related to flavonoids in the chocolate.”
“Flavonoids appear to be protective against cardiovascular disease
through antioxidants, anti-clotting and anti-inflammatory properties,”
said Prof Susanna.
The study also stated that milk chocolate was ideal option in Sweden
and the dark chocolate has been linked to benefits for the heart in the
past.
Dr. Clare Walton, from the Stroke Association, UK said, “Past research
has shown that eating dark chocolate might go some way to reduce your
stroke risk if it’s eaten as part of a healthy, balanced diet.” Or maybe richer/healthier persons can afford to buy dark chocolate.
Dr Walton also said, “This study suggests that eating a moderate amount
of other types of chocolate could also be beneficial in men.” It is
sensible enough to understand that eat chocolates in moderation as it
contains high sugar and fat content.
Chocolate is a raw or processed food produced from the seed of tropical
Theobroma cacao tree. It mostly comes in dark, milk, and white
varieties with cocoa solids and contributes to brown coloration.
My theory on motor recovery - stroke rehab
I put this out there with no professional background, borrowed from Cassalita and my original OT on eccentric vs. concentric contractions.Most therapists focus on functional recovery because that's what they are paid for. From some questions directed to me, a lot of survivors have a specific movement they want to recover - not necessarily functional. And no one is giving them any help in planning out how to recover that. And as Steven Wolf says, 'Stroke patients need to rely more on their own problem solving to regain mobility', Prerequisites are a decent muscle anatomy or body-building book or anatomy software that shows the complete range of movement of the muscles you are interested in. My example is the bicep.
1. First you need to see where you have some control. straighten your arm out, see if you can exert force at any point in the contraction phase, this might entail having someone lift your arm up bit by bit to see if you have some muscle control at any point, try this standing and lying down. That determines if you have some concentric contractions. Then get the lower arm to 90 degrees to your body and try to lower it. You may need someone to pull on your hand to tell if you can resist. That determines if you have eccentric contractions.
2. If you have control at any point, start there and move it back and forth, thousands to millions of times.
3. If that doesn't produce anything it's time to go to the dead brain recovery options - these are not really proven yet and some can be quite dangerous(videos and mirrors)
a. Mental imagery
b. Passive movement
c. Mirror therapy
d. Thermal therapy
e. Action observation
4. If 3 works go back and repeat 1 and 2.
Remember, this is not for personal use, ask your doctors and therapists for validation first.
If your doctor or therapist has given you something better, please post it, it must be worth a lot since it is not public information.
1. First you need to see where you have some control. straighten your arm out, see if you can exert force at any point in the contraction phase, this might entail having someone lift your arm up bit by bit to see if you have some muscle control at any point, try this standing and lying down. That determines if you have some concentric contractions. Then get the lower arm to 90 degrees to your body and try to lower it. You may need someone to pull on your hand to tell if you can resist. That determines if you have eccentric contractions.
2. If you have control at any point, start there and move it back and forth, thousands to millions of times.
3. If that doesn't produce anything it's time to go to the dead brain recovery options - these are not really proven yet and some can be quite dangerous(videos and mirrors)
a. Mental imagery
b. Passive movement
c. Mirror therapy
d. Thermal therapy
e. Action observation
4. If 3 works go back and repeat 1 and 2.
Remember, this is not for personal use, ask your doctors and therapists for validation first.
If your doctor or therapist has given you something better, please post it, it must be worth a lot since it is not public information.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)