Stroke has a large and broad impact on society, with disproportional
effects by sex. An estimated 80 million people worldwide are living with
stroke. Nearly half of stroke survivors have residual deficits,
including weakness or cognitive dysfunction, months after their stroke.
Women
bear the brunt of disability, with women experiencing worse
health-related quality of life after a stroke compared to men. By 2030,
there will be an estimated 12 million stroke deaths and 70 million
stroke survivors each year, and women will increasingly outnumber men.
These statistics suggest an anticipated greater increase of the burden
of stroke in women.
This Research Topic will focus on gaps in
current knowledge, including but not limited to: sex and gender
differences in race-ethnic minorities, interventions to increase
awareness of the differences in stroke symptoms, access to
rehabilitation, rehabilitation interventions that address specific
disability in women and sex-specific interventions focused on health
behaviors. We are also interested in gender disparities in stroke
leadership including low-middle income countries.
We welcome Original Research, Reviews, Commentaries, and Systematic Reviews as part of this collection.
Please
note that Frontiers also offers a Fee Support Program, available to any
authors seeking financial support. If you would like any further
information about this, please get in touch with the Editorial Office at
globalwomenshealth@frontiersin.org.
If you would like input on whether your topic or approach would be a good fit for this
Research
Topic, please email Cheryl Carcel ccarcel@georgeinstitute.org.au,
including your name, paper topic, and approach.
Keywords:
stroke, stroke rehabilitation, Sex differences
Important Note:
All contributions to this Research Topic
must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are
submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves
the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section
or journal at any stage of peer review.
No comments:
Post a Comment