Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, February 2, 2026

Study Finds Surprising Link Between Aspirin in Seniors and Cancer Mortality

 Have your competent? doctor explain how this affects you.

I've been taking a 325 apirin for almost 19 years now to reduce clotting ability not to thin the blood. Not going to change.

Study Finds Surprising Link Be tween Aspirin in Seniors and Cancer Mortality

Longer follow-up of the ASPREE cohort is warranted, says researcher
by , Senior Editor, MedPage Today

 Key Takeaways 
  • Among more than 19,000 older adults, cancer incidence during 10 years of follow-up was almost identical in patients who used aspirin and those who did not. 
  • Use of aspirin was associated with increased cancer-related mortality.
  • Aspirin was linked to a reduced risk of melanoma and an increased risk of brain cancer, though this was based on small numbers of events. 
Low-dose aspirin was not associated with a reduced incidence of cancer in older adults, but was associated with an increased risk of dying of cancer, according to a cohort study of participants from the randomized ASPREE trial. Among more than 19,000 adults with a mean age of 75, cancer incidence during 10 years of follow-up was almost identical in patients who used aspirin and those who did not (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.05). The risk of dying of cancer was 15% higher in patients who took low-dose aspirin. An analysis of 14,907 surviving participants who continued follow-up in the extension phase of the randomized ASPREE trial showed no difference in cancer incidence or cancer mortality, reported Suzanne G. Orchard, PhD, of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, and colleagues in JAMA Oncology.

Despite the size of the study and the extended duration of follow-up, the results do not rule out the possibility of a benefit from low-dose aspirin, said Orchard.

"It is hard to say anything definitive, especially since there are not that many studies conducted in older persons," she told MedPage Today. "The earlier studies have found that cancer incidence benefits can take up to 10 to 15 years to manifest, and so longer follow-up of the current ASPREE cohort is warranted, to see if the associations between aspirin and cancer incidence and mortality change over time."

"We would like to see whether aspirin can impact specific subgroups differently, and earlier work in our group has indicated this may be the case," she noted. "Studies exploring the mechanism of action in older people would also be valuable -- for example, those with certain gene variants. There have been some reports of individuals with PI3K gene variations responding differently to aspirin. So, genetic profiling of the cancers from those in the aspirin arm versus the placebo arm may shed some light on the mechanism."

The data did show a reduced incidence of melanoma in the aspirin arm, and an increased incidence of brain cancer, two findings that require further investigation, Orchard said.

Early randomized clinical trials of aspirin and cancer, mostly involving middle-age adults, showed a reduced risk of cancer and lower cancer-related mortality, particularly for colorectal cancer (CRC). The Women's Health Study provided additional evidence of a favorable effect of aspirin on CRC.

More recent studies showed that starting aspirin at an older age had no effect on cancer outcomes or increased rates of malignancy. However, follow-up in these studies was too brief for a preventive effect on cancer to emerge, the authors noted in their introduction.

The ASPREE trial comprised a randomized phase with a median follow-up of 4.7 years and a 5-year extension phase (ASPREE-XT) to examine long-term impact of prior randomization to aspirin or placebo. Conducted in Australia and the U.S., the trial enrolled patients ages 70 and older (65 or older for Black and Latino patients in the U.S.), who were randomized to low-dose aspirin (100 mg/day) or placebo. Eligible patients were free of cardiovascular disease, dementia, and independence-limiting physical disability.

The randomized phase enrolled patients from 2010-2014 with follow-up to 2017. ASPREE-XT followed study participants from 2018-2024.

For the overall population, 3,448 cancers and 1,173 cancer-related deaths occurred during 10 years of follow-up (median 8.6 years). New cancers were almost evenly distributed between the two arms, 1,701 in the aspirin group and 1,747 in the placebo group. Incidence of localized, metastatic, and hematologic malignancies was also similar between the two groups. The aspirin arm had 623 deaths versus 550 in the placebo arm, resulting in a hazard ratio of 1.15 (95% CI 1.03-1.29).

During ASPREE-XT, 689 cancers occurred in the patients originally randomized to aspirin versus 762 in the placebo group, a nonsignificant 9% difference (95% CI 0.82-1.01). Each group had 188 cancer-related deaths (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83-1.25).

The incidence and mortality for colorectal cancer, a topic of multiple studies of cancer prevention with aspirin, were almost identical in the overall and ASPREE-XT analyses.

Over the entire duration of follow-up, fewer cases of melanoma occurred in the aspirin arm (159 vs 209, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94). The difference persisted in the analysis limited to ASPREE-XT participants (71 vs 101, HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96).

During the randomized phase of the investigation, significantly more patients in the aspirin group developed brain cancer, though absolute numbers were small (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.05-3.65). Additionally, the aspirin group had a higher mortality for combined rare cancers (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.21-3.61).

"The results are difficult to be certain of due to low sample sizes," said Orchard.

No comments:

Post a Comment